Jury begins 2nd full day of deliberations in Tsarnaev penalty phase

FILE - In this March 5, 2015 file courtroom sketch, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, center, is depicted between defense attorneys Miriam Conrad, left, and Judy Clarke, right, during his federal death penalty trial in Boston. (AP Photo/Jane Flavell Collins, File)

BOSTON (WPRI/AP) — Jurors in the trial of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are set to return to federal court Friday to resume deliberations on his punishment.

The jury of seven women and five men deliberated about 8½ hours Wednesday and Thursday without reaching a verdict. They return to court Friday morning a half hour earlier than usual, at 8:30 a.m.

As they deliberate, jurors must fill out a lengthy, complicated verdict form that asks them to make findings on 12 aggravating factors prosecutors say support a death sentence and 21 mitigating factors his lawyers say support a decision to instead sentence him to life in prison.

The jurors must weigh any mitigating factors they find against any aggravating factors to determine Tsarnaev’s sentence.

Seventeen of the 30 charges Tsarnaev was convicted of carry the possibility of the death penalty.

Three people were killed and more than 260 were injured when two pressure cooker bombs packed with shrapnel exploded near the marathon finish line on April 15, 2013. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer was killed days later.

Prosecutors told the jury Tsarnaev is a remorse-free terrorist who bombed the marathon to retaliate against the U.S. for wars in Muslim countries. His lawyers say he was a “good kid” who was led down the path to terrorism by his radicalized older brother.

The verdict form, which is 24 pages long, is like a worksheet for the jury. It walks jurors through a process before they get to the decision on whether Tsarnaev is sentenced to death or life in prison.

First, the jurors must decide whether any “gateway,” or threshold, factors exist, including whether Tsarnaev intentionally killed the victim or victims; inflicted serious bodily injury that resulted in death; participated in an act contemplating that the life of a person would be taken; or engaged in an act of violence knowing that it created a grave risk of death so that it constitutes reckless disregard for human life.

Then, they must begin deciding on the various mitigating and aggravating factors.

It isn’t until Page 21 of the form that the jury is asked to check off what Tsarnaev’s sentence will be.

Comments are closed.